Hello, We have a board that is based on Freescale's P2041 SoC. The boards has 2 PCIe buses with this topology: PCIe 0 <---> PEX8505 switch <---> 4 network devices PCIE 2 <---> FPGA On 3.10.33 + a subset of the Freescale SDK 1.4 patches, both PCIe buses work well and we are able to use the devices on them. For each bus, I however keep getting EDAC PCIe errors at the very first stage of bus enumeration (please see the attached kernel log, with some debug output from arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c and drivers/pci/probe.c) for both buses. My current "understanding" of the situation is such: since PCI_PROBE_NORMAL is used, pcibios_scan_phb() calls pci_scan_child_bus() that does a pci_scan_slot() on the bus for 32 slots. The first pci_scan_slot() is successful and it discovers the P2041's PCIe Controller. All the 31 other pci_scan_slot() calls generate an EDAC PCIe error, that is triggered by the configuration read transaction to read an hypothetical vendor ID of a device on the bus. This is relevant with that is reported by the EDAC error handler (all the 31 are the same): > PCIE error(s) detected > PCIE ERR_DR register: 0x00020000 ICCA bit is set: Access to an illegal configuration space from PEX_CONFIG_ADDR/PEX_CONFIG_DATA was detected. > PCIE ERR_CAP_STAT register: 0x80000001 To is set: Transaction originated from PEX_CONFIG_ADDR/PEX_CONFIG_DATA. > PCIE ERR_CAP_R0 register: 0x00000800 FMT: 0b00, TYPE: 0b00100 (Config read I guess) > PCIE ERR_CAP_R1 register: 0x00000000 > PCIE ERR_CAP_R2 register: 0x00000000 > PCIE ERR_CAP_R3 register: 0x00000000 Afterwards, pci_scan_child_bus() calls pcibios_fixup_bus (that maybe helps ?). >From here, since the P2041's PCIe Controller is a bridge, pci_scan_bridge is called for this bus and all the devices are detected without having any configuration transaction causing EDAC errors. Has someone already observed such a behavior ? Why do these initial transaction generate an error ? What would be a possible fix to avoid these transaction errors for these 31 (unneded ?) pci_scan_slot() calls on the initial bus ? Best Regards, Valentin