Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

From: Alexei Starovoitov <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:28:34 -0700

On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to
> sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get
> covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to
> quickly tag the precise problem.
>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email-masked]>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <[email-masked]>

Makes sense. Looks like ppc jit will be using quite a bit of
available ppc instructions. Nice.

I'm assuming all these new tests passed with x64 jit?

Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email-masked]>