public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux•intel.com>
To: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile•com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org>
Cc: "mingo@kernel•org" <mingo@kernel•org>
Subject: Re: debug problems on ppc 83xx target due to changed struct task_struct
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:19:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57B1EBAE.6030503@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41e00d07-d7ce-0198-acce-ac25db8c9df3@keymile.com>

On 08/15/2016 07:35 AM, Holger Brunck wrote:
> I tried this but unfortunately the error only occurs while remote debugging.
> Locally with gdb everything works fine. BTW we double-checked with a 85xx ppc
> target which is also 32-bit and it ends up with the same behaviour.
> 
> I was also investigating where I have to move the line in the struct task_struct
> and it turns out to be like this (diff to 4.7 kernel):
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 253538f..4868874 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1655,7 +1655,9 @@ struct task_struct {
>         struct signal_struct *signal;
>         struct sighand_struct *sighand;
> 
> +       // struct thread_struct thread;   // until here everything is fine
>         sigset_t blocked, real_blocked;
> +       struct thread_struct thread;      // from here it's broken
>         sigset_t saved_sigmask; /* restored if set_restore_sigmask() was used */
>         struct sigpending pending;

Wow, thanks for all the debugging here!

So, we know it has to do with signals, thread_info, and probably only
affects 32-bit powerpc.  Seems awfully weird.  Have you checked with any
of the 64-bit powerpc guys to see if they have any ideas?

I went grepping around for a bit.

Where is the task_struct stored?  Is it on-stack on ppc32 or something?
 The thread_info is, I assume, but I see some THREAD_INFO vs. THREAD
(thread struct) math happening in here, which confuses me:

        .globl  ret_from_debug_exc
ret_from_debug_exc:
        mfspr   r9,SPRN_SPRG_THREAD
        lwz     r10,SAVED_KSP_LIMIT(r1)
        stw     r10,KSP_LIMIT(r9)
        lwz     r9,THREAD_INFO-THREAD(r9)
        CURRENT_THREAD_INFO(r10, r1)
        lwz     r10,TI_PREEMPT(r10)
        stw     r10,TI_PREEMPT(r9)
        RESTORE_xSRR(SRR0,SRR1);
        RESTORE_xSRR(CSRR0,CSRR1);
        RESTORE_MMU_REGS;
        RET_FROM_EXC_LEVEL(SPRN_DSRR0, SPRN_DSRR1, PPC_RFDI)

But, I'm really at a loss to explain this.  It still seems like a deeply
ppc-specific issue.  We can obviously work around it with an #ifdef for
your platform, but that's awfully hackish and hides the real bug,
whatever it is.

My suspicion is that there's a bug in the 32-bit ppc assembly somewhere.
 I don't see any references to 'blocked' or 'real_blocked' in assembly
though.  You could add a bunch of padding instead of moving the
thread_struct and see if that does anything, but that's really a stab in
the dark.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-15 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-12 14:50 debug problems on ppc 83xx target due to changed struct task_struct Holger Brunck
2016-08-12 15:14 ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-12 15:47   ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-12 16:09     ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-15 14:35       ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-15 16:19         ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2016-08-16 17:27           ` christophe leroy
2016-08-16 17:36             ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-17  8:22               ` Christophe Leroy
2016-08-17 15:27             ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-18  8:23               ` Christophe Leroy
2016-08-19 11:03               ` Christophe Leroy
2016-08-19 11:14                 ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-19 13:44                   ` Christophe Leroy
2016-08-19 16:26                     ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-16 22:13           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-08-17 15:05             ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-17 14:59           ` Holger Brunck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57B1EBAE.6030503@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@linux$(echo .)intel.com \
    --cc=holger.brunck@keymile$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox