From: Patrice Bouchand <pb_fwd_list@yahoo•fr>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org
Subject: mcpu options for AMCC440 with fpu
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:45:04 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <600461.55072.qm@web23412.mail.ird.yahoo.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2382 bytes --]
Hello,
I was searching for the best mcpu option for amcc440, compiling and running a small program you can find here:
http://magnux.free.fr/gcc/mandelbrot.c. My distro is a ppc fedora core 6, and results are obviously the same using DENX4.0.
--------------------
-bash-3.00# gcc -O2 ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot && time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
real 1m15.059s
user 1m14.996s
sys 0m0.060s
-bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440 ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot && time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
real 0m39.606s
user 0m39.552s
sys 0m0.028s
-bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440fp ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot && time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
real 1m15.016s
user 1m14.988s
sys 0m0.024s
-bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -msoft-float ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot && time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
real 0m39.577s
user 0m39.544s
sys 0m0.032s
--------------------
* I do not explain why not using FPU gives better results ?
* I did also a test with bzip2.c ( http://pag.csail.mit.edu/~smcc/projects/single-file-programs/bzip2.c ).
----------------------
-bash-3.00# gcc -O2 ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 && time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
real 0m18.478s
user 0m18.216s
sys 0m0.152s
-bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440 ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 && time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
real 0m18.786s
user 0m18.544s
sys 0m0.128s
-bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440fp ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 && time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
real 0m18.811s
user 0m18.548s
sys 0m0.144s
-bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=G3 ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 && time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
real 0m18.871s
user 0m18.644s
sys 0m0.104s
----------------------
* mcpu option seems to not have any effect ?
* My third test was to compile and run mplayer.
- With default options (no mcpu specified), my test mpeg was smooth.
- With mcpu=440fp, my test mpeg was not smooth.
Can anybody bring me some lights about the right gcc mcpu option for amcc440 ?
Best regards,
Patrice Bouchand
---------------------------------
Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3259 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2007-02-19 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-19 8:45 Patrice Bouchand [this message]
2007-02-21 19:47 ` mcpu options for AMCC440 with fpu Patrice Bouchand
2007-02-21 21:35 ` Magnus Hjorth
2007-02-22 6:57 ` RE : " Patrice Bouchand
2007-02-23 22:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-02-24 6:44 ` Patrice Bouchand
2007-02-24 20:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=600461.55072.qm@web23412.mail.ird.yahoo.com \
--to=pb_fwd_list@yahoo$(echo .)fr \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox