public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert David <albert.david@gmail•com>
To: Albert David <albert.david@gmail•com>, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org
Subject: Re: BDI2000 with PPC405EP
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 13:25:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <61124de7050908005569734361@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050908063136.GA22596@gate.ebshome.net>

Dear Eugene,
Thanks for your suggestion! This was indeed a hardware bug! I found a
problem with my cpu strapping pins! UART0_TX was never driven
externally(it was left open),
Thanks again for your reply,
with best regards,
Albert.

On 9/8/05, Eugene Surovegin <ebs@ebshome•net> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:33:53AM +0530, Albert David wrote:
> > Friends,
> > I have been trying to find a solution to fix "PPC: timeout while
> > waiting for freeze" for my custom board.
> > BDI2000 keeps resetting the system with the following message...
> >
> > TARGET: processing user reset request
> > TARGET: resetting target passed
> > TARGET: processing target startup ....
> > *** TARGET: core #0 startup failed # PPC: timeout while waiting for fre=
eze
> > TARGET: target will be restarted in 10 sec
> >
> > I tried all the possible solutions provided at
> > http://www.ultsol.com/faq-P206.htm for this perticular behaviour but
> > the problem remains same!
> >
> > I have ensured that my Board's JTAG interface is properly working by
> > boundary scanning the pins of PPC405EP using UniversalScan software
> > with Altera-ByteBlaster MV.
> >
> > for your information: twice i could succeed connecting BDI2000 with my
> > target! somehow it happen to work while i was trying to execute low
> > level JTAG commands such as 'rir' rdr'  and then after exiting(JTAG
> > command shell of BDI) it worked, but there is no consistency!
> >
> > looks like my cpu core is not halting after asserting HALT line.
> > has anyone faced similar problem??
>=20
> In _all_ cases I saw this problem it was a hw bug. Ask your hw
> engineers to help you. Start with the usual suspects: power, clocks,
> strapping, etc.
>=20
> I don't think working boundary scan is an indication that hw design is
> OK.
>=20
> --
> Eugene
>=20
>

      reply	other threads:[~2005-09-08  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-08  6:03 BDI2000 with PPC405EP Albert David
2005-09-08  6:31 ` Eugene Surovegin
2005-09-08  7:55   ` Albert David [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=61124de7050908005569734361@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=albert.david@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox