public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman•id.au>
To: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail•com>,
	Gustavo Romero <gromero@linux•vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org
Cc: leitao@debian•org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/powerpc: Calculate spin time in tm-unavailable
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:02:50 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871sk2c985.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1511307683.7121.5.camel@gmail.com>

Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail•com> writes:

> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 11:31 -0200, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>> Hi Cyril,
>> 
>> On 21-11-2017 05:17, Cyril Bur wrote:
>> > Currently the tm-unavailable test spins for a fixed amount of time in
>> > an attempt to ensure the FPU/VMX/VSX facilities are off. This value was
>> > experimentally tested to be long enough.
>> > 
>> > Problems may arise if kernel heuristics were to change. This patch
>> > should future proof this test.
>> 
>> I've tried it on a VM running on '4.14.0-rc7' and apparently it gets stuck
>> pretty slow on calibration, since it ran ~7m without finding the correct value
>> (before it would take about 3m), like:
>> 
>> $ time ./tm-unavailable
>> Testing required spin time required for facility unavailable...
>> 	Trying 0x18000000...
>> 	Trying 0x19000000...
>> 	Trying 0x1a000000...
>> ...
>> 	Trying 0xfd000000... ^C
>> 
>> real	7m15.304s
>> user	7m15.291s
>> sys	0m0.004s
>> 
>
> Interesting! I didn't test in a VM. I guess hypervisor switching
> completely changes the heuristic. Ok I'll have to rethink.
>
> Maybe the increase should be a multiplier to get to a good state more
> quickly.

Yeah this sucks in a VM:

# /home/michael/tm-unavailable 
Testing required spin time required for facility unavailable...
	Trying 0x18000000... 
	Trying 0x19000000... 
...
	Trying 0x110000000...  

etc.

I got sick of waiting for it, but it's causing my selftests job to time
out so it must be taking > ~1 hour.

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-11  2:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-21  7:17 [PATCH 1/2] selftests/powerpc: Check for pthread errors in tm-unavailable Cyril Bur
2017-11-21  7:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/powerpc: Calculate spin time " Cyril Bur
2017-11-21 13:31   ` Gustavo Romero
2017-11-21 23:41     ` Cyril Bur
2017-12-11  2:02       ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2017-12-11  3:40         ` Cyril Bur
2017-11-21 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests/powerpc: Check for pthread errors " Gustavo Romero
2017-12-12 11:39 ` [1/2] " Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871sk2c985.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman$(echo .)id.au \
    --cc=cyrilbur@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=gromero@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox