From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail•com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel•org>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux•dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle•com, willy@infradead•org,
linux-mm@kvack•org
Cc: fvdl@google•com, hannes@cmpxchg•org, riel@surriel•com,
shakeel.butt@linux•dev, kas@kernel•org, baohua@kernel•org,
dev.jain@arm•com, baolin.wang@linux•alibaba.com,
npache@redhat•com, Liam.Howlett@oracle•com, ryan.roberts@arm•com,
vbabka@suse•cz, lance.yang@linux•dev,
linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, kernel-team@meta•com,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux•ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman•id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] mm: thp: allocate PTE page tables lazily at split time
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 17:43:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875x82ma6q.ritesh.list@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13ab56cb-7fdb-4ee4-9170-f9f4fa4b6e37@kernel.org>
"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel•org> writes:
> CCing ppc folks
>
Thanks David!
> On 2/11/26 13:49, Usama Arif wrote:
>> When the kernel creates a PMD-level THP mapping for anonymous pages,
>> it pre-allocates a PTE page table and deposits it via
>> pgtable_trans_huge_deposit(). This deposited table is withdrawn during
>> PMD split or zap. The rationale was that split must not fail—if the
>> kernel decides to split a THP, it needs a PTE table to populate.
>>
>> However, every anon THP wastes 4KB (one page table page) that sits
>> unused in the deposit list for the lifetime of the mapping. On systems
>> with many THPs, this adds up to significant memory waste. The original
>> rationale is also not an issue. It is ok for split to fail, and if the
>> kernel can't find an order 0 allocation for split, there are much bigger
>> problems. On large servers where you can easily have 100s of GBs of THPs,
>> the memory usage for these tables is 200M per 100G. This memory could be
>> used for any other usecase, which include allocating the pagetables
>> required during split.
>>
>> This patch removes the pre-deposit for anonymous pages on architectures
>> where arch_needs_pgtable_deposit() returns false (every arch apart from
>> powerpc, and only when radix hash tables are not enabled) and allocates
>> the PTE table lazily—only when a split actually occurs. The split path
>> is modified to accept a caller-provided page table.
>>
>> PowerPC exception:
>>
>> It would have been great if we can completely remove the pagetable
>> deposit code and this commit would mostly have been a code cleanup patch,
>> unfortunately PowerPC has hash MMU, it stores hash slot information in
>> the deposited page table and pre-deposit is necessary. All deposit/
>> withdraw paths are guarded by arch_needs_pgtable_deposit(), so PowerPC
>> behavior is unchanged with this patch. On a better note,
>> arch_needs_pgtable_deposit will always evaluate to false at compile time
>> on non PowerPC architectures and the pre-deposit code will not be
>> compiled in.
>
> Is there a way to remove this? It's always been a confusing hack, now
> it's unpleasant to have around :)
>
Hash MMU on PowerPC works fundamentally different than other MMUs
(unlike Radix MMU on PowerPC). So yes, it requires few tricks to fit
into the Linux's multi-level SW page table model. ;)
> In particular, seeing that radix__pgtable_trans_huge_deposit() just 1:1
> copied generic pgtable_trans_huge_deposit() hurts my belly.
>
On PowerPC, pgtable_t can be a pte fragment.
typedef pte_t *pgtable_t;
That means a single page can be shared among other PTE page tables. So, we
cannot use page->lru which the generic implementation uses. I guess due
to this, there is a slight change in implementation of
radix__pgtable_trans_huge_deposit().
Doing a grep search, I think that's the same for sparc and s390 as well.
>
> IIUC, hash is mostly used on legacy power systems, radix on newer ones.
>
> So one obvious solution: remove PMD THP support for hash MMUs along with
> all this hacky deposit code.
>
Unfortunately, please no. There are real customers using Hash MMU on
Power9 and even on older generations and this would mean breaking Hash
PMD THP support for them.
>
> the "vma_is_anonymous(vma) && !arch_needs_pgtable_deposit()" and similar
> checks need to be wrapped in a reasonable helper and likely this all
> needs to get cleaned up further.
>
> The implementation if the generic pgtable_trans_huge_deposit and the
> radix handlers etc must be removed. If any code would trigger them it
> would be a bug.
>
Sure, I think after this patch series, the radix__pgtable_trans_huge_deposit()
will mostly be a dead code anyways. I will spend some time going
through this series and will also give it a test on powerpc HW (with
both Hash and Radix MMU).
I guess, we should also look at removing pgtable_trans_huge_deposit() and
pgtable_trans_huge_withdraw() implementations from s390 and sparc, since
those too will be dead code after this.
> If we have to keep this around, pgtable_trans_huge_deposit() should
> likely get renamed to arch_pgtable_trans_huge_deposit() etc, as there
> will not be generic support for it.
>
Sure. That make sense since PowerPC Hash MMU will still need this.
-ritesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-12 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260211125507.4175026-1-usama.arif@linux.dev>
[not found] ` <20260211125507.4175026-2-usama.arif@linux.dev>
2026-02-11 13:25 ` [RFC 1/2] mm: thp: allocate PTE page tables lazily at split time David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-11 13:38 ` Usama Arif
2026-02-12 12:13 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2026-02-12 15:25 ` Usama Arif
2026-02-12 15:39 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-12 16:46 ` Ritesh Harjani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875x82ma6q.ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--to=ritesh.list@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle$(echo .)com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=baohua@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux$(echo .)alibaba.com \
--cc=david@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm$(echo .)com \
--cc=fvdl@google$(echo .)com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg$(echo .)org \
--cc=kas@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta$(echo .)com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux$(echo .)dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack$(echo .)org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle$(echo .)com \
--cc=maddy@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman$(echo .)id.au \
--cc=npache@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=riel@surriel$(echo .)com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm$(echo .)com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux$(echo .)dev \
--cc=usama.arif@linux$(echo .)dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse$(echo .)cz \
--cc=willy@infradead$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox