Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] powerpc/smp: Remove unused inline functions

From: Daniel Axtens <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:01:53 +1100

Hi,

> commit 441c19c8a290 ("powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv: Rework the secondary inhibit code")
> left behind this, so can remove it.
>

Interesting: that commit removed some instances of
(un)inhibit_secondary_onlining, but it seems to have missed the ones for
the uni-processor case, which your patch removes. This seems like a good
change.

Checkpatch does have one small complaint about your commit message:

| WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
| #6: 
| commit 441c19c8a290 ("powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv: Rework the secondary inhibit code")

I don't think this warrants another revision, I think leaving the commit
name on one line makes sense.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <[email-masked]>

Kind regards,
Daniel

> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> index 7a13bc20f0a0..ad7129a19e8f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -189,8 +189,6 @@ extern void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu);
>  #define hard_smp_processor_id()		get_hard_smp_processor_id(0)
>  #define smp_setup_cpu_maps()
>  #define thread_group_shares_l2  0
> -static inline void inhibit_secondary_onlining(void) {}
> -static inline void uninhibit_secondary_onlining(void) {}
>  static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_sibling_mask(int cpu)
>  {
>  	return cpumask_of(cpu);
> -- 
> 2.17.1