Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc/copro: Use appropriate ESID mask in copro_calculate_slb

From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:43:28 +0530

Ian Munsie <[email-masked]> writes:

> From: Ian Munsie <[email-masked]>
>
> This patch makes copro_calculate_slb mask the ESID by the correct mask
> for 1T vs 256M segments.
>
> This has no effect by itself as the extra bits were ignored, but it
> makes debugging the segment table entries easier and means that we can
> directly compare the ESID values for duplicates without needing to worry
> about masking in the comparison.
>
> This will be used to simplify a comparison in the following patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <[email-masked]>

Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email-masked]>

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c
> index 0f9939e..5a236f0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c
> @@ -99,8 +99,6 @@ int copro_calculate_slb(struct mm_struct *mm, u64 ea, struct copro_slb *slb)
>  	u64 vsid;
>  	int psize, ssize;
>  
> -	slb->esid = (ea & ESID_MASK) | SLB_ESID_V;
> -
>  	switch (REGION_ID(ea)) {
>  	case USER_REGION_ID:
>  		pr_devel("%s: 0x%llx -- USER_REGION_ID\n", __func__, ea);
> @@ -133,6 +131,7 @@ int copro_calculate_slb(struct mm_struct *mm, u64 ea, struct copro_slb *slb)
>  	vsid |= mmu_psize_defs[psize].sllp |
>  		((ssize == MMU_SEGSIZE_1T) ? SLB_VSID_B_1T : 0);
>  
> +	slb->esid = (ea & (ssize == MMU_SEGSIZE_1T ? ESID_MASK_1T : ESID_MASK)) | SLB_ESID_V;
>  	slb->vsid = vsid;
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.1.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email-masked]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/