public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman•id.au>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail•com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel•crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/64: do not trace irqs-off at interrupt return to soft-disabled context
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 23:55:55 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fu8qsld0.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171204160714.2ff62d11@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>

Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail•com> writes:

> On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:09:57 +1100
> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman•id.au> wrote:
>
>> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail•com> writes:
>> 
>> > When an interrupt is returning to a soft-disabled context (which can
>> > happen for non-maskable interrupts or synchronous interrupts), it goes
>> > through the motions of soft-disabling again, including calling
>> > TRACE_DISABLE_INTS (i.e., trace_hardirqs_off()).
>> >
>> > This is not necessary, because we must already be soft-disabled in the
>> > interrupt context, it also may be causing crashes in the irq tracing
>> > code to re-enter as an nmi. Replace it with a warning to ensure that
>> > soft-interrupts are still disabled.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail•com>
>> > ---
>> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 10 +++++++---
>> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)  
>> 
>> So this patch is the core of the bug fix I gather.
>> 
>> Git blames says:
>> 
>>   Fixes: 7c0482e3d055 ("powerpc/irq: Fix another case of lazy IRQ state getting out of sync")
>>   Cc: stable@vger•kernel.org # v3.4+
>> 
>> But I'm wondering how this has been broken that long without us
>> noticing? You hit it doing some sort of perf stress test I think - so is
>> it just that we've never pushed hard enough? Or did something change to
>> expose this? Or we're just not sure?
>
> I'm not really sure. A customer hit it, during either a stress test or
> long running workload with lockdep irq tracing and perf running at the
> same time. I don't have a lot more details but we might be able to get
> some offline if necessary.

No worries.

I'll put it in and add it to my maybe-for-stable list. We can let it
soak a bit and then send it to stable if we think it's necessary and has
no issues.

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-04 12:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-16 16:00 [PATCH 0/4] interrupt tracing fixes Nicholas Piggin
2017-11-16 16:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] powerpc: define __ARCH_IRQ_EXIT_IRQS_DISABLED Nicholas Piggin
2018-01-22  3:34   ` [1/4] " Michael Ellerman
2017-11-16 16:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/64: do not trace irqs-off at interrupt return to soft-disabled context Nicholas Piggin
2017-12-04  5:09   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-12-04  6:07     ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-12-04 12:55       ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2017-12-04 16:12     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-12-05  5:52       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-12-12 11:39   ` [2/4] " Michael Ellerman
2017-11-16 16:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpuidle/powernv: avoid double irq enable coming out of idle Nicholas Piggin
2018-01-22  3:34   ` [3/4] " Michael Ellerman
2017-11-16 16:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] " Nicholas Piggin
2018-01-22  3:34   ` [4/4] " Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fu8qsld0.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman$(echo .)id.au \
    --cc=benh@kernel$(echo .)crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox