Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] mm: Add MAP_BELOW_HINT

From: Michael Ellerman <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 18:26:41 +1000

Charlie Jenkins <[email-masked]> writes:
> Some applications rely on placing data in free bits addresses allocated
> by mmap. Various architectures (eg. x86, arm64, powerpc) restrict the
> address returned by mmap to be less than the 48-bit address space,
> unless the hint address uses more than 47 bits (the 48th bit is reserved
> for the kernel address space).
>
> To make this behavior explicit and more versatile across all
> architectures, define a mmap flag that allows users to define an
> arbitrary upper limit on addresses returned by mmap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h       | 1 +
>  tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h | 1 +
  
You're not meant to update the headers in tools/ directly. There's a
mail somewhere from acme somewhere describing the proper process, but
the tldr is leave it up to him.

> diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> index 6ce1f1ceb432..03ac13d9aa37 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>  
>  #define MAP_UNINITIALIZED 0x4000000	/* For anonymous mmap, memory could be
>  					 * uninitialized */
> +#define MAP_BELOW_HINT	  0x8000000	/* give out address that is below (inclusive) hint address */

IMHO the API would be clearer if this actually forced the address to be
below the hint. That's what the flag name implies after all.

It would also mean the application doesn't need to take into account the
length of the mapping when passing the hint.

cheers