Subject: Re: Linux powerpc new system call instruction and ABI

From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 09:39:33 -0300

Nicholas Piggin via Libc-alpha <[email-masked]> writes:

> As a more hacky thing you could make a syscall with -1 and see how
> the error looks, and then assume all syscalls will be the same.

I'm not sure this would work.
Even in glibc, it's expected that early syscalls will use sc while scv is used
later in the execution.

-- 
Tulio Magno