public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux•vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs•org>
Cc: benh@kernel•crashing.org, mpe@ellerman•id.au,
	linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 03/18] powerpc/mm: add _PAGE_HASHPTE similar to 4K hash
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:52:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87si0jhjcw.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160223053847.GA14286@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com>

Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs•org> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:18:05AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> The difference between 64K and 4K hash fault handling is confusing
>> with respect to when we set _PAGE_HASHPTE in the linux pte.
>> I was trying to find out whether we miss a hpte flush in any
>> scenario because of this. ie, a pte update on a linux pte, for which we
>> are doing a parallel hash pte insert. After looking at it closer my
>> understanding is this won't happen because pte update also look at
>> _PAGE_BUSY and we will wait for hash pte insert to finish before going
>> ahead with the pte update. But to avoid further confusion keep the
>> hash fault handler for all the page size similar to  __hash_page_4k.
>> 
>> This partially reverts commit 41743a4e34f0 ("powerpc: Free a PTE bit on ppc64 with 64K pages"
>
> In each of the functions you are modifying below, there is already an
> explicit setting of _PAGE_HASHPTE in new_pte.  So I don't think this
> is necessary, or if we do this, we can eliminate the separate setting
> of _PAGE_HASHPTE later on.
>
> In general I think it's better to leave the setting of _PAGE_HASHPTE
> until we know what slot the HPTE is going to go into.  That way we
> have less chance of ending up with _PAGE_HASHPTE set but bogus
> information in _PAGE_F_GIX and _PAGE_F_SECOND.
>

Ok. I will do a variant that remove _PAGE_HASHPTE setting from 4k. ie, 

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_4k.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_4k.c
index e3e76b929f33..47d1b26effc6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_4k.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_4k.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ int __hash_page_4K(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
 		 * a write access. Since this is 4K insert of 64K page size
 		 * also add _PAGE_COMBO
 		 */
-		new_pte = old_pte | _PAGE_BUSY | _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_HASHPTE;
+		new_pte = old_pte | _PAGE_BUSY | _PAGE_ACCESSED;
 		if (access & _PAGE_RW)
 			new_pte |= _PAGE_DIRTY;
 	} while (old_pte != __cmpxchg_u64((unsigned long *)ptep,

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-23  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-23  4:48 [PATCH V4 00/18] Book3s abstraction in preparation for new MMU model Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 01/18] powerp/mm: Update code comments Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 02/18] mm: Some arch may want to use HPAGE_PMD related values as variables Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-25  5:06   ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 03/18] powerpc/mm: add _PAGE_HASHPTE similar to 4K hash Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  5:38   ` Paul Mackerras
2016-02-23  9:22     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 04/18] powerpc/mm: Split pgtable types to separate header Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-25  3:12   ` Paul Mackerras
2016-02-25  5:35     ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 05/18] powerpc/mm: Don't have conditional defines for real_pte_t Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-25  3:24   ` Paul Mackerras
2016-02-25  6:03   ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 06/18] powerpc/mm: Switch book3s 64 with 64K page size to 4 level page table Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-25  3:39   ` Paul Mackerras
2016-02-26  2:07     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 07/18] powerpc/mm: Update masked bits for linux " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-25  3:41   ` Paul Mackerras
2016-02-26  2:08     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 08/18] powerpc/mm: Copy pgalloc (part 1) Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-25  4:27   ` Paul Mackerras
2016-02-26  2:11     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 09/18] powerpc/mm: Copy pgalloc (part 2) Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 10/18] powerpc/mm: Copy pgalloc (part 3) Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 11/18] powerpc/mm: Hugetlbfs is book3s_64 and fsl_book3e (32 or 64) Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-25  5:41   ` Paul Mackerras
2016-02-26  9:57     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 12/18] powerpc/mm: Use flush_tlb_page in ptep_clear_flush_young Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 13/18] powerpc/mm: Move hash related mmu-*.h headers to book3s/ Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 14/18] powerpc/mm: Create a new headers for tlbflush for hash64 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 15/18] powerpc/mm: Move hash page table related functions to pgtable-hash64.c Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-25  4:32   ` Scott Wood
2016-02-26 10:00     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 16/18] powerpc/mm: THP is only available on hash64 as of now Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 17/18] powerpc/mm: Use generic version of pmdp_clear_flush_young Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  4:48 ` [PATCH V4 18/18] powerpc/mm: Move hash64 specific definitions to separate header Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-23  9:26 ` [PATCH V4 00/18] Book3s abstraction in preparation for new MMU model Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-25  4:34   ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87si0jhjcw.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel$(echo .)crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman$(echo .)id.au \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox