public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Allen Curtis <acurtis@onz•com>
To: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale•com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org>
Subject: Re: RFC: cpm2_devices.c
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:39:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98b4f8a0f803860b423ef494ed041d6d@onz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e763199be1cca62d14cf4d0011b5f6e0@freescale.com>

>> So have we answered your question regarding the inclusion of DMA and
>> CPM in the platform_device array? If I am reading this correctly, all
>> the individual CPM "objects" should be defined in the device structure
>> with their physical address location defined. The complete IMMAP
>> structure can then be constructed from these objects if required.
>
> Actually, I dont feel that anyone has given a reason why or how they 
> would use CPM, DMA, SI1, SI2 if they were platform devices.
>

Think about the breaking up of the immap structure into little pieces 
with offsets defined in platform_devices....  This is how I read the 
previous conversation.

>> Is it possible to add some flags to the IORESOURCE information to
>> address the differences in SCC structures between processor types?
>> Perhaps something like this could be used to apply the correct
>> structure cast in the device driver. Just a thought...
>
> I envisioned this being a field in the platform_data structures for 
> the devices.
>
Then you envision a device specific structure for each platform_device, 
even if the sole purpose is to convey version information? Ok...

- Allen

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-16 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-14 18:18 RFC: cpm2_devices.c Allen Curtis
2005-06-15  3:35 ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15  3:57   ` Allen Curtis
2005-06-15  4:13     ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15  4:41       ` Allen Curtis
2005-06-15 14:24         ` Jason McMullan
2005-06-15 15:06           ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15 17:48             ` Allen Curtis
2005-06-15 18:05               ` Vitaly Bordug
2005-06-15 14:29         ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15 14:30         ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-16 15:12       ` Dan Malek
2005-06-16 15:33         ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-16 15:42           ` Allen Curtis
2005-06-16 15:53             ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-16 16:39               ` Allen Curtis [this message]
2005-06-16 19:33           ` Dan Malek
2005-06-15  7:55   ` Vitaly Bordug
2005-06-15 14:25     ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15 14:33       ` Jason McMullan
2005-06-15 15:01         ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15 15:31       ` Vitaly Bordug
2005-06-15 15:41         ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15 16:07           ` Vitaly Bordug
2005-06-16  6:42           ` Pantelis Antoniou
2005-06-16  9:33             ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-06-16 15:02             ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98b4f8a0f803860b423ef494ed041d6d@onz.com \
    --to=acurtis@onz$(echo .)com \
    --cc=kumar.gala@freescale$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox