From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl•com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson•dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale•com>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add support for binary includes.
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:24:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1JBtq4-0005DJ-7o@jdl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:20:43 +1100." <20080105122043.GG4326@localhost.localdomain>
So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
>
>
> Hrm. Can we leave this one until after 1.1? Since it adds new
> syntax, I think it would be worth cogitating a bit longer.
Double hrm.
Scott, can you remind us why this feature was requested
off the U-Boot list, please? I'm trying to decide if we
really do want to get it into the 1.1 release.
Thanks,
jdl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-07 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-04 21:10 [PATCH 1/3] Add support for binary includes Scott Wood
2008-01-05 12:20 ` David Gibson
2008-01-07 15:24 ` Jon Loeliger [this message]
2008-01-07 17:25 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1JBtq4-0005DJ-7o@jdl.com \
--to=jdl@jdl$(echo .)com \
--cc=david@gibson$(echo .)dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox