From: "Allen Curtis" <acurtis@onz•com>
To: "David Gibson" <david@gibson•dropbear.id.au>,
<linuxppc-embedded@lists•linuxppc.org>
Subject: RE: very minor 405GP and 405GPr PCI difference
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 21:26:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <NCBBIINEHIPFGJPLBEIFEEMFDMAA.acurtis@onz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021002014219.GF1848@zax>
> That's right. Is there a reason for boards to have different
> mappings? I can well believe that there is, but the current tree
> doesn't show it - all the boards (in the tree) that have PCI appear to
> do the same initialisation of the windows. It doesn't seem worthwhile
> to create board specific PCI initialisation hooks until we have a
> board that needs it.
If all boards are suppose to have the same mapping, why doesn't someone
document it as such? It would have saved me a lot of time. If it isn't a
good enough rule to be documented then make the system flexible enough to
take a different path if required. (proactive)
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-02 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-27 12:27 very minor 405GP and 405GPr PCI difference Ralph Blach
2002-09-30 4:01 ` David Gibson
2002-10-01 5:21 ` David Gibson
2002-10-01 8:37 ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
2002-10-02 1:42 ` David Gibson
2002-10-02 4:26 ` Allen Curtis [this message]
2002-10-02 5:34 ` David Gibson
2002-10-02 17:03 ` Matt Porter
2002-10-03 1:10 ` David Gibson
2002-10-03 15:14 ` Matt Porter
2002-10-04 2:48 ` David Gibson
2002-10-04 18:33 ` Todd Poynor
2002-10-08 4:17 ` David Gibson
2002-10-08 19:39 ` Todd Poynor
2002-10-09 2:14 ` David Gibson
[not found] ` <20021 <20021023040850.GC1198@zax>
2002-10-24 23:50 ` Ralph Blach
2002-10-25 1:19 ` David Gibson
2002-10-02 7:46 ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
2002-10-03 1:12 ` David Gibson
2002-10-03 8:28 ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
2002-10-06 5:23 ` Andrew May
2002-10-07 1:31 ` Matt Porter
2002-10-08 4:14 ` David Gibson
2002-10-08 5:21 ` Andrew May
2002-10-08 14:56 ` Matt Porter
2002-10-08 17:31 ` Andrew May
2002-10-08 18:20 ` Matt Porter
2002-10-09 1:58 ` David Gibson
2002-10-09 10:35 ` Kenneth Johansson
2002-10-09 15:21 ` Allen Curtis
2002-10-11 19:37 ` Andrew May
2002-10-14 1:20 ` David Gibson
2002-10-08 6:19 ` Allen Curtis
2002-10-08 15:18 ` Matt Porter
2002-10-09 2:10 ` David Gibson
2002-10-22 21:55 ` Todd Poynor
2002-10-23 4:08 ` David Gibson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-23 13:10 Ralph Blach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=NCBBIINEHIPFGJPLBEIFEEMFDMAA.acurtis@onz.com \
--to=acurtis@onz$(echo .)com \
--cc=david@gibson$(echo .)dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists$(echo .)linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox