Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has()

From: Borislav Petkov <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 20:43:03 +0200

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:26:18AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> >>  	/*
> >> -	 * If SME is active we need to be sure that kexec pages are
> >> -	 * not encrypted because when we boot to the new kernel the
> >> +	 * If host memory encryption is active we need to be sure that kexec
> >> +	 * pages are not encrypted because when we boot to the new kernel the
> >>  	 * pages won't be accessed encrypted (initially).
> >>  	 */
> > 
> > That hunk belongs logically into the previous patch which removes
> > sme_active().
> 
> I was trying to keep the sev_active() changes separate... so even though
> it's an SME thing, I kept it here. But I can move it to the previous
> patch, it just might look strange.

Oh I meant only the comment because it is a SME-related change. But not
too important so whatever.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette