public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lawrence E. Bakst" <ml@iridescent•org>
To: ML linuxppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org>
Subject: Future of OCP
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:04:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <p0621020ebe656d463a67@mail.iridescent.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0.20050322_000905.tnt@patchsend.246tNt.com>

I apologize up front for my ignorance.

At 12:06 AM +0100 3/22/05, Sylvain Munaut wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>This series of patch changes all the MPC52xx related code
>to use platform bus and ppc_sys instead of OCP. It's
>divided in several patches that represents "steps" in
>the conversion. However the intermediate states might
>not be functionnal.
>
>This is the first try, comments and suggestions are
>welcomed.


At 9:35 AM -0600 1/18/05, Kumar Gala wrote:
>System platform_device description, discovery and management:
>
>On most embedded PPC systems we either have a core CPU and chipset
>(MPC10x, TSI10x, Marvell, etc.) or a system-on-chip device (4xx, 8xx,
>82xx, 85xx, etc.).  Some of these sub-archs have been using the On Chip
>Peripheral (OCP) driver model.  The functionality that OCP provide has
>been replaced by the generic driver model and platform_device.  Also, some
>of these device may exist across a number of architectures (PPC, MIPS,
>ARM) such that some information that is shared between the architecture
>and driver needs to exist outside of either.
>
>The ppc_sys changes add a standard way for PowerPC systems to describe the
>devices and systems that exist in the sub-arch.  Additionally, we are able
>to discover which system we are and manage which devices are actually
>registered and any platform specific fixups that may be needed.
>
>Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale•com>

Q1: OK, so I gather the OCP system which until recently used to be in a separate OCP tree and was recently integrated into 2.6 is going away?

I had just started to do a 405 EP port of 2.6.11-rc4  based off of the bubinga config.

Q2: Assuming yes, to Q1, any advice on how I should proceed, continue on with an OCP port or wait for this new stuff?

Q3: How does one stay in the loop on this stuff? With only about 3 messages posted in this group and none in linuxppc-dev I am clearly in the wrong place. I feel like I missed the conversation. Where was it?

Best,

leb

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-22  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-21 23:06 [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Change MPC52xx to platform bus / ppc_sys model Sylvain Munaut
2005-03-21 23:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] ppc32: Remove unnecessary test in MPC52xx reset code Sylvain Munaut
2005-03-21 23:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] ppc32: Remove the OCP system from the Freescale MPC52xx support Sylvain Munaut
2005-03-21 23:08 ` [PATCH 3/6] ppc32: Change constants style in Freescale MPC52xx related code Sylvain Munaut
2005-03-21 23:08 ` [PATCH 4/6] ppc32: Add platform bus / ppc_sys model to Freescale MPC52xx Sylvain Munaut
2005-03-25 15:15   ` Kumar Gala
2005-03-21 23:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] serial: Update mpc52xx_uart.c to use platform bus Sylvain Munaut
2005-03-21 23:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] ppc32: Adds necessary cpu init to use USB on LITE5200 Platform Sylvain Munaut
2005-03-22  1:11 ` [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Change MPC52xx to platform bus / ppc_sys model Kumar Gala
2005-03-22  7:12   ` Sylvain Munaut
2005-03-24  8:37     ` [RFC] MPC5200 PCI problem Andrey Volkov
2005-03-24 14:34       ` Sylvain Munaut
2005-03-24 18:58         ` Andrey Volkov
2005-03-25 12:32           ` [RFC] MPC5200 Kernel/UBoot " Andrey Volkov
2005-03-25 13:02             ` Dale Farnsworth
2005-03-25 14:00             ` Sylvain Munaut
2005-03-22  7:04 ` Lawrence E. Bakst [this message]
2005-03-22  7:48   ` Future of OCP Eugene Surovegin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=p0621020ebe656d463a67@mail.iridescent.org \
    --to=ml@iridescent$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox