Subject: RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.

From: "Ravinandan Arakali" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:07:56 -0800

Jeff,
By default, sendmail puts the From: address as "[email-masked]".
We suspect this may be causing your pobox domain to reject the
message. We'll try sending the first patch to you with
From: address set to Koushik's(using -f option of sendmail).
Kindly ack if you get the patch and we'll send the rest of the
patches.

Thanks,
Ravi

-----Original Message-----
From: Ravinandan Arakali [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 9:56 AM
To: 'Jeff Garzik'
Cc: 'koushik'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]';
[email-masked]'; [email-masked]';
[email-masked]'
Subject: RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.

Jeff,
All the 12 patches were sent by Koushik on Fri evening. We(Rapuru,
myself) have received it.
mailq shows the following error for your address "Sender address
rejected: Domain not found". Is there an alternate address where
we can send the patches ?

Can anybody on the netdev list confirm if they got the patches ?

Regards,
Ravi

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 9:11 AM
To: [email-masked]
Cc: 'koushik'; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
[email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Subject: Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.

Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> Jeff,
> Thanks for the excellent suggestion. We have used this method to send all
> the 12 patches. Note that since our mail server went down and came back
> up during this process, the mail containing patch3 has appeared twice. 
> Pls ignore the duplicate.

Alas, I'm still waiting for the patches...  Does 'mailq' show messages 
waiting to be delivered?

	Jeff