Subject: Re: [PATCH] IP1000A: IC Plus update 2006-08-22

From: "Jesse Huang" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:45:46 +0800

It's Ok. Thanks for that.

Jesse
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Francois Romieu" <[email-masked]>
To: "Jesse Huang" <[email-masked]>
Cc: <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>;
<[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>;
<[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IP1000A: IC Plus update 2006-08-22

Francois Romieu <[email-masked]> :
> Jesse Huang <[email-masked]> :
> [...]
>
> Added:
> 0039-ip1000-cosmetic-in-ipg_interrupt_handler.txt
> 0040-ip1000-irq-handler-and-device-close-race.txt
> 0041-ip1000-schedule-the-host-error-recovery-to-user-context.txt
> 0042-ip1000-no-need-to-mask-a-constant-field-with-RSVD_MASK.txt

Added:
0043-ip1000-use-the-new-IRQF_-constants-and-the-dma_-alloc-free-_coherent-AP
I.txt
0044-ip1000-mixed-case-and-upper-case-removal.txt
0045-ip1000-add-ipg_-r-w-8-16-32-macros.txt

The patches beyond 0043 are only available through HTTP. Since 0043
needs a recent enough kernel and the current driver has branched from
an old release, I plan to rebase my branch. Does it raise any objection
or remark ?

-- 
Ueimor