Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 2/4] net: stmmac: dwc-qos: Add FSD EQoS support

From: "Swathi K S" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 14:45:30 +0530

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <[email-masked]>
> Sent: 28 January 2025 19:19
> To: Swathi K S <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> [email-masked]; [email-masked]; linux-
> [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; linux-
> [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] net: stmmac: dwc-qos: Add FSD EQoS support
> 
> > +static int fsd_clks_endisable(void *priv, bool enabled) {
> > +	struct fsd_eqos_plat_data *plat = priv;
> > +
> > +	if (enabled) {
> > +		return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(plat->num_clks, plat->clks);
> > +	} else {
> > +		clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(plat->num_clks, plat->clks);
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int fsd_eqos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +			  struct plat_stmmacenet_data *data,
> > +			  struct stmmac_resources *res)
> > +{
> > +	struct fsd_eqos_plat_data *priv_plat;
> > +	struct clk *rx1 = NULL;
> > +	struct clk *rx2 = NULL;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	priv_plat = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv_plat),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!priv_plat)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	priv_plat->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +
> > +	ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(&pdev->dev, &priv_plat->clks);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "No clocks
> available\n");
> > +
> > +	priv_plat->num_clks = ret;
> 
> It looks like you should be able to share all the clk_bulk code with
> tegra_eqos_probe(). The stmmac driver suffers from lots of cut/paste code
> with no consolidation. You can at least not make the tegra code worse by
> doing a little refactoring.

Hi Andrew, 
Just to clarify, you were referring to refactoring tegra code to use
clk_bulk APIs, right?
In that case, will look into this and evaluate the best approach for
refactoring the code. 

- Swathi

> 	Andrew