Subject: Re: [PATCH: 2.6.13-15-SMP 3/3] network: concurrently run softirq network code on SMP

From: "John Ye" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:25:10 +0800

David,

Thanks for your reply. I understand it's not worth to do.

I have made it a loadable module to fulfill the function. it mainly for busy
NAT gateway server with SMP to speed up.

John Ye

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Miller" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Cc: <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>;
<[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 1:46 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH: 2.6.13-15-SMP 3/3] network: concurrently run softirq
network code on SMP

>
> The whole reason the queues are per-cpu is so that we do not
> have to touch remote processor state nor use locks of any
> kind whatsoever.
>
> With multi-queue networking cards becoming more and more
> available, which will split up the packet workload in
> hardware across all available cpus, there is less and less
> reason to make a patch like this one.
>
> We've known about this issue for ages, and if we felt it
> was appropriate to make this change, we would have done
> so years ago.
>