Subject: RE: proposal for new wireless configuration API

From: Johannes Berg <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:45:49 +0200

On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 09:45 -0700, Simon Barber wrote:
> I did mean RSSI - just about anything that when interpreted as an 8 bit
> unsigned int and goes up with increasing signal fits the bill as an RSSI
> measure. RCPI requires a certain minimum accuracy and linearity (the
> accuracy required is not very high).

Ah got it now, sorry. Yes, good point.

Thanks for explaining,
johannes