Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce BROKEN_ON_64BIT facility

From: Alan Cox <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:21:11 +0100

> (whitespace damaged; more for comment than for application).
> 
> > -        if ((u32)skb->data & 3) {
> > +        if ((unsigned long)skb->data & 3) {
> 
> I suppose it quietens a compiler warning.  Doesn't actually fix a bug
> though.

Right but it does no harm casting it to either so its worth cleaning up.