Subject: Re: [PATCH] wext

From: Johannes Berg <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:15:10 +0200

On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 14:45 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote:

> SIOCSIWMLME was designed to allow additional MLME commands to be added.
> IMHO, a potential replacement in the future should not prevent us from
> extending WEXT at this point and stop all changes in something that is
> currently available.

Fine with me, it's really just a matter of switch()ing on the
sub-command in the cfg80211-we compat code. My answer was more political
in nature I guess -- even I need sleep, you know. :P

johannes