Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] d80211: add support for SIOCSIWRATE and SIOCGIWRATE

From: Johannes Berg <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:02:32 +0200

On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 14:59 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:

> But we will have to convert d80211 to cfg80211 anyway,
> so it will depend on the way rate limiting is implemented in cfg80211
> in the end.

I'd think it should be more the other way round with d80211/cfg80211
doing whatever makes most sense...

johannes