Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] d80211: add support for SIOCSIWRATE and SIOCGIWRATE

From: Johannes Berg <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:42:11 +0200

On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 15:34 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:

> Current WE implementation of rate limiting (SIOCSIWRATE) doesn't make
> much sense with d80211. 

Right.

> Hopefully we'll invent a better solution for
> cfg80211. 

We could do it right here and now then. I haven't understood the matter
though, may I delegate it to you (plural "you" intended here)

> Then we will probably need to put some constraints on
> SIOCSIWRATE emulation (like "rate limiting is lost when you are
> disassociated") - hence the comment.

That's ok.

johannes