From: jamal <hadi@cyberus•ca>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
Cc: johnpol@2ka•mipt.ru, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel•com,
kumarkr@linux•ibm.com, herbert@gondor•apana.org.au,
gaagaan@gmail•com, Robert.Olsson@data•slu.se,
netdev@vger•kernel.org, rdreier@cisco•com, mcarlson@broadcom•com,
randy.dunlap@oracle•com, jagana@us•ibm.com,
general@lists•openfabrics.org, mchan@broadcom•com, tgraf@suug•ch,
jeff@garzik•org, sri@us•ibm.com, shemminger@linux-foundation•org,
kaber@trash•net
Subject: [ofa-general] NET_BATCH: some results
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:49:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191793743.4352.13.camel@localhost> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 645 bytes --]
It seems prettier to just draw graphs and since this one is small file;
here it is attached. The graph demos a patched net-2.6.24 vs a plain
net-2.6.24 kernel with a udp app that sends on 4 CPUs as fast as the the
lower layers would allow it.
Refer to my earlier description of the test setup etc.
As i noted earlier on, for this hardware at about 200B or so, we
approach wire speed, so the app is mostly idle above that as the link
becomes the bottleneck; example it is > 85% idle on 512B and > 90% idle
on 1024B. This is so for either batch or non-batch. So the
differentiation is really in the smaller sized packets.
Enjoy!
cheers,
jamal
[-- Attachment #2: batch-pps.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 12238 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2007-10-07 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1191793743.4352.13.camel@localhost \
--to=hadi@cyberus$(echo .)ca \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data$(echo .)slu.se \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=gaagaan@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=general@lists$(echo .)openfabrics.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor$(echo .)apana.org.au \
--cc=jagana@us$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik$(echo .)org \
--cc=johnpol@2ka$(echo .)mipt.ru \
--cc=kaber@trash$(echo .)net \
--cc=kumarkr@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom$(echo .)com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom$(echo .)com \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle$(echo .)com \
--cc=rdreier@cisco$(echo .)com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=sri@us$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug$(echo .)ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox