Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: allow execution of multiple rx_hooks per interface

From: Matt Mackall <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:03:45 -0600

On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 15:59 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Matt Mackall <[email-masked]>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:21:48 -0600
> 
> > Looks pretty good. Dave?
> > 
> > Acked-by: Matt Mackall <[email-masked]>
> 
> I don't like the loop for RX ARP processing.
> 
> The packet contents aren't going to change, so doing basic
> packet validation inside of the "for each RX client" loop
> of arp_reply() doesn't make any sense.

True. Dan, please help our poor compilers with some manual loop
invariant motion.

-- 
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux