public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare•com>
To: Dimitris Michailidis <dm@chelsio•com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel•com>,
	davem@davemloft•net, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel•com,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ethtool PATCH 4/4] v5 Add RX packet classification interface
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 00:34:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304465684.2873.26.camel@bwh-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DC08E7B.7070906@chelsio.com>

On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 16:23 -0700, Dimitris Michailidis wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 09:12 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
[...]
> > +int rxclass_rule_ins(int fd, struct ifreq *ifr,
> > +		     struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec *fsp)
> > +{
> > +	struct ethtool_rxnfc nfccmd;
> > +	__u32 loc = fsp->location;
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * if location is unspecified pull rules from device
> > +	 * and allocate a free rule for our use
> > +	 */
> > +	if (loc == RX_CLS_LOC_UNSPEC) {
> > +		/* init table of available rules */
> > +		err = rmgr_init(fd, ifr);
> > +		if (err < 0)
> > +			return err;
> > +
> > +		/* verify rule location */
> > +		err = rmgr_add(fsp);
> > +		if (err < 0)
> > +			return err;
> > +
> > +		/* cleanup table and free resources */
> > +		rmgr_cleanup();
> > +	}
> 
> This logic where ethtool tries to select a filter slot when a user provides 
> RX_CLS_LOC_UNSPEC does not work in general.  It assumes that all slots are 
> equal and a new filter can go into any available slot. But a device may have 
> restrictions on where a filter may go that ethtool doesn't know.

I agree.  And if filter lookup is largely hash-based (as it is in
Solarflare hardware) the user will also find it very difficult to
specify the right location!

> I mentioned during a previous review that for cxgb4 some filters require a 
> slot number that is a multiple of 4.  There are some other constraints as 
> well depending on the type of filter being added. For such a device ethtool 
> doesn't know enough to handle RX_CLS_LOC_UNSPEC correctly.
>
> I think RX_CLS_LOC_UNSPEC should be passed to the driver, where there is 
> enough knowledge to pick an appropriate slot.  So I'd remove the
> 
>      if (loc == RX_CLS_LOC_UNSPEC)
> 
> block above, let the driver pick a slot, and then pass the selected location 
> back for ethtool to report.

But first we have to specify this in the ethtool API.  So please propose
a patch to ethtool.h.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-03 23:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-03 16:12 [ethtool PATCH 0/4] Add support for network flow classifier Alexander Duyck
2011-05-03 16:12 ` [ethtool PATCH 1/4] ethtool: remove strings based approach for displaying n-tuple Alexander Duyck
2011-05-03 16:12 ` [ethtool PATCH 2/4] Cleanup defines and header includes to address several issues Alexander Duyck
2011-05-03 16:12 ` [ethtool PATCH 3/4] Add support for __be64 and bitops, centralize several needed macros Alexander Duyck
2011-05-03 16:12 ` [ethtool PATCH 4/4] v5 Add RX packet classification interface Alexander Duyck
2011-05-03 23:23   ` Dimitris Michailidis
2011-05-03 23:34     ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2011-05-04  0:29       ` Alexander Duyck
2011-05-04  1:35         ` Dimitris Michailidis
2011-05-04  3:10           ` Alexander Duyck
2011-05-04 17:09       ` Dimitris Michailidis
2011-05-04 17:24         ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-04 17:33           ` Dimitris Michailidis
2011-05-04 17:41             ` Alexander Duyck
2011-05-04 18:05               ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-04 18:21                 ` Alexander Duyck
2011-05-04 18:45                   ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-04 21:07                     ` Alexander Duyck
2011-05-04 21:54                       ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-04 19:06                 ` Dimitris Michailidis
2011-05-04 18:18               ` Dimitris Michailidis
2011-05-04 18:35                 ` Alexander Duyck
2011-05-04 18:50                   ` Dimitris Michailidis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1304465684.2873.26.camel@bwh-desktop \
    --to=bhutchings@solarflare$(echo .)com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=dm@chelsio$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox