Subject: Re: [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8

From: Joe Perches <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:32:44 -0800

On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 13:16 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
> 
> This allows some architectures with hardware instructions for bit
> reversals to eliminate the array.

This one is already in -next

commit 7a1283d8f5298437a454ec477384dcd9f9f88bac
Author: Joe Perches <[email-masked]>
Date:   Tue Oct 28 14:18:58 2014 -0700

    carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
    
    Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
    
    This allows some architectures with hardware instructions
    for bit reversals to eliminate the array.
    
    Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email-masked]>
    Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email-masked]>