Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: fix mlx4_en_set_rxfh()

From: Joe Perches <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:56:31 -0800

On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 09:05 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 18:53 +0200, Amir Vadai wrote:
> > >  	 */
> > >  	for (i = 0; i < priv->rx_ring_num; i++) {
> > > +		if (!ring_index)
> > > +			continue;
> > 
> > Why didn't you put the whole loop under the 'if'?
> 
> To avoid adding one indentation on the block, and ease this code review.
> 
> This is hardly fast path, and compiler does the optim for us anyway.

It might have been more sensible
to use break instead of continue