Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/14] wireless: Use eth_<foo>_addr instead of memset

From: Johannes Berg <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:34:35 +0100

On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 02:29 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:

> Nope, you simply misunderstood what I did write.
> 
> What I said was that the arguments were likely
> already aligned(2), not that the alignment was
> a requirement.

Fair enough. That's not actually true/guaranteed though as far as this
patch is concerned.

johannes