Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] wireless: Use bool function returns of true/false instead of 1/0

From: Joe Perches <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:49:01 -0700

On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 20:46 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 03/29/2015 08:29 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Use bool constants as the return values instead of 1 and 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email-masked]>
> > ---
> >> To be honest I'd might rather get bunches of these, there has to be a ton
> >> of them, than a slow trickle of one every few weeks/days.
> >
> > There aren't too many here either...
> >
> >   drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c                        | 12 ++++++------
> >   drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c                  |  6 +++---
> >   drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/rfkill.c               |  8 ++++----
> >   drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_cmn.c |  2 +-
> >   drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_lcn.c |  2 +-
> >   drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-config.h             |  4 ++--
> >   6 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> Please split these into separate patches for each driver. That way it will be 
> possible to search 'git log' for the contributions to each driver. Otherwise, 
> the patches are OK.

It's still possible.

git log <directory> shows the individual patches.