Subject: Re: RFC: disablenetwork facility. (v4)

From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:28:01 -0500

On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:55:11 +0100, Pavel Machek said:

> it is really only required for binaries setuid to someone else, but
> that would be too ugly. (Plus, as someone said, ping is great for
> leaking data out.)

Hmm... How is it "too ugly"?  It's just a 'euid != uid' comparison? Or
am I missing some contortion required?