Subject: Re: [PATCH] lan78xx: Protect runtime_auto check by #ifdef CONFIG_PM

From: Oliver Neukum <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:29:12 +0100

On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 11:13 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Indeed. In that case the point is moot. But it is correct to ask
> > the core whether the device is autosuspended at that point rather
> > than keep a private flag if you can.
> 
> That's why we have pm_runtime_status_suspended().

I guess we are in violent agreement though we were unaware of being
in that state.

	Regards
		Oliver