Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] e1000e: e1000e_cyclecounter_read(): incvalue is 32 bits, not 64

From: Jeff Kirsher <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:57:14 -0700

On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 14:34 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> "incvalue" variable holds a result of "er32(TIMINCA) &
> E1000_TIMINCA_INCVALUE_MASK"
> and used in "do_div(temp, incvalue)" as a divisor.
> 
> Thus, "u64 incvalue" declaration is probably a mistake.
> Even though it seems to be a harmless one, let's fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <[email-masked]>
> CC: Jeff Kirsher <[email-masked]>
> CC: Jesse Brandeburg <[email-masked]>
> CC: Shannon Nelson <[email-masked]>
> CC: Carolyn Wyborny <[email-masked]>
> CC: Don Skidmore <[email-masked]>
> CC: Bruce Allan <[email-masked]>
> CC: John Ronciak <[email-masked]>
> CC: Mitch Williams <[email-masked]>
> CC: David S. Miller <[email-masked]>
> CC: LKML <[email-masked]>
> CC: [email-masked]
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

First of all, trimmed down the recipient list since almost all of the
reviewers you added have nothing to do with e1000e.

Any chance you can send this to the "correct" list intel-wired-
[email-masked]?  Kind of amazing that your shotgun blast approach
in emailing out the patch series managed to miss sending it to the one
email list that handles Intel Wired LAN kernel patches.