Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe

From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2022 23:40:08 +0000

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <[email-masked]>:

On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 21:07:12 +0800 you wrote:
> Fix a bug in commit 46ed5fc33db9, which wrongly used the
> func_name instead of probe_name to register legacy kprobe.
> 
> Fixes: 46ed5fc33db9 ("libbpf: Refactor and simplify legacy kprobe code")
> Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <[email-masked]>
> Tested-by: Hengqi Chen <[email-masked]>
> Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Qiang Wang <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <[email-masked]>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/71cff670baff
  - [v2,2/2] libbpf: Support repeated legacy kprobes on same function
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/51a33c60f1c2

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html