Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: optimize eth_type_trans() vs CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 03:30:07 +0000

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <[email-masked]>:

On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 06:17:25 +0000 you wrote:
> Some platforms exhibit very high costs with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y
> when a function needs to pass the address of a local variable to external
> functions.
> 
> eth_type_trans() (and its callers) is showing this anomaly on AMD EPYC 7B12
> platforms (and maybe others).
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] net: optimize eth_type_trans() vs CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ec1e48e97feb

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html