Subject: Re: kernel bug in socketpair()

From: "David S. Miller" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:07 -0700

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:14:57 -0400 (EDT)
Glenn Fowler <[email-masked]> wrote:

> named sockets seem a little heavyweight for this application

I think it'll be cheaper than unnamed unix sockets and
groveling in /proc/*/fd/

And even if there is a minor performance issue, you'll more than get
that back due to the portability gain. :-)