Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethtool_ops rev 4

From: "David S. Miller" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:01:36 -0700

On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 19:01:21 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[email-masked]> wrote:

> A DO_ETHTOOL_OPS macro in the driver's ->do_ioctl -- intentionally not 
> included in the kernel -- does the rest,

I don't understand.

Where does this DO_ETHTOOL_OPS macro come from?  Is it defined
by kcompat?  If so, how will drivers in vanilla 2.4.x trees end
up with the DO_ETHTOOL_OPS define?