Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethtool_ops rev 4

From: "David S. Miller" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:43:28 -0700

On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 19:42:44 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Still need the boring and obvious definition of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS in 
> mainline, though.

Like I said, I've got no problem with that part.