Subject: Re: Bug in qeth in 2.6

From: Pete Zaitcev <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:45:12 -0400

On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:54:43AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> could you please elaborate what's exactly wrong with qeth_verify_dev()?
> 
> It has the same behaviour as in 2.4, and it looks correct to us...

2.4 was like this:

	result = 0;
	for (all in list) {
		if (something)
			result = QETH_VERIFY_IS_SOMETHING;
	}

2.6 is:

	result = 0;
	for (all in list) {
		result = (something)? QETH_VERIFY_IS_SOMETHING: foo();
	}

Results are different if two cards are present on the list
and the function is asked to verify the first card.

-- Pete