Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable

From: "David S. Miller" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:37:00 -0800

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:19:50 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@ <[email-masked]> wrote:

> In article <[email-masked]> (at Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:09:47 -0800), Shirley Ma <[email-masked]> says:
> 
> > But if no applications use this value, and nothing is boken. It's not
> > harmful to change the kernel to provide MIBs in as-is format.
> 
> Shirley, nobody can prove that nothing will be broken. :-)

And also, the current situation is OK as long as this value we present now
can be converted into the desired value.  Is this the case?