Subject: Re: [NFS] [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on forrpciod

From: "David S. Miller" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:00:36 -0800

On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 21:48:59 +0100 (CET)
[email-masked] wrote:

> I'll admit that the rpciod killer code is racy, but I'm not sure that
> completions are the best answer, as they have at least one nasty feature:
> they are not interruptible.

Would you like to back out the change then?  I put it into
Linus's tree already.