Subject: Re: netdev ioctl & dev_base_lock : bad idea ?

From: "David S. Miller" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 22:06:42 -0800

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:48:49 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email-masked]> wrote:

> I suppose there is a good reason we can't just use the rtnl_sem for
> these guys, though why isn't dev_base_lock a read/write semaphore
> instead of a spinlock ? At least on ppc, I don't think there's any
> overhead in the normal path, and this is not on a very critical path
> anyway, is it ?

It can't be a semphore because it is taken in packet processing,
and thus softint handling, paths.