Subject: Re: Route cache performance

From: Simon Kirby <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:57:58 -0700

On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:49:03PM +0200, Robert Olsson wrote:

>  It's called trade-off's :) rDoS is hardly nomal case? But maybe it's time 
>  to compare routing via route hash vs FIB lookup directly again now when 
>  we have RCU with some FIB lookup's too.

I haven't even filled the route tables yet.  I've just been testing with
a bog standard table (three /24s and one /0).

Simon-