public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl•org>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86•org>
Cc: bcrl@kvack•org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft•net, netdev@vger•kernel.org, shai@scalex86•org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] net: percpufy frequently used vars -- add percpu_counter_mod_bh
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 16:32:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060308163258.36f3bd79.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060309001803.GF4493@localhost.localdomain>

Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86•org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 03:43:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack•org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I think it may make more sense to simply convert local_t into a long, given 
> > > that most of the users will be things like stats counters.
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, I agree that making local_t signed would be better.  It's consistent
> > with atomic_t, atomic64_t and atomic_long_t and it's a bit more flexible.
> > 
> > Perhaps.  A lot of applications would just be upcounters for statistics,
> > where unsigned is desired.  But I think the consistency argument wins out.
> 
> It already is... for most of the arches except x86_64.

x86 uses unsigned long.

> And on -mm, the asm-generic version uses atomic_long_t for local_t (signed
> long) which seems right.

No, it uses unsigned long.  The only place where signedness matters is
local_read(), and there it is typecast to ulong.

> Although, I wonder why we use:
> 
> #define local_read(l) ((unsigned long)atomic_long_read(&(l)->a))
> 
> It would return a huge value if the local counter was even -1 no?

It's casting a signed long to an unsigned long.  That does the right thing.
Yes, it'll convert -1 to 0xffffffff[ffffffff].

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-09  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-08  1:58 [patch 0/4] net: percpufy frequently used vars on struct proto Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-08  1:59 ` [patch 1/4] net: percpufy frequently used vars -- add percpu_counter_mod_bh Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-08  2:13   ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08 20:26     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-08 20:36       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-08 21:07         ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-08 21:17           ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-08 22:25             ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-08 22:41               ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-08 23:43                 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-09  0:18                   ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-09  0:32                     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-03-09  8:06                       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-09  4:14                         ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-09  8:14                         ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-09  8:22                           ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-09  8:41                             ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-09 18:39                               ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-08 23:06               ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08 23:12                 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-09  2:21                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-09  2:32                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08  2:01 ` [patch 2/4] net: percpufy frequently used vars -- struct proto.memory_allocated Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-08  2:14   ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08  3:08     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-08  3:22       ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08 20:54         ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-08  2:02 ` [patch 3/4] net: percpufy frequently used vars -- proto.sockets_allocated Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-08  2:16   ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08 20:56     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-08  2:03 ` [patch 4/4] net: percpufy frequently used vars -- proto.inuse Ravikiran G Thirumalai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060308163258.36f3bd79.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl$(echo .)org \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack$(echo .)org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=kiran@scalex86$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=shai@scalex86$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox