Subject: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()

From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 00:46:08 -0600

Evgeniy,

On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> 
> Since pseudo-randomness affects both folded and not folded hash
> distribution, it can not end up in different results.

Yes it would, so to rule out pseudo-random effects the pseudo-
random number generator must be removed.

> 
> You are right that having test with 2^48 values is really interesting,
> but it will take ages on my test machine :)

Try a usable subset; no pseudo-random number generator.