Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API

From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:40:31 -0600

Daniel,

On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> 
> This has the makings of a nice stable internal kernel api.  Why do we want
> to provide this nice stable internal api to proprietary modules?

Why not?  Not all non-GPL modules are proprietary.  Do we lose
something by making a nice stable api available to non-derived
modules?